SIMP | system automation and configuration management stack | Automation library

Your proof text is trying to give two different variables the name r. For your case pattern try a different name, e.g. case(TaTb l r'). You will get the same proof state except r' instead of ra__.

As summarized by the comments, you have two problems:

1. cases "l" rule: S.induct makes little sense and you should either use a nested induction induction l rule: S.induct or a case distinction cases l rule: S.cases

2. In cases you should use ?thesis instead of cases as the Isabelle/jEdit outline tells you (you can click on that thing to insert it into the buffer!). That way you would also have given a name to all variable in the case TaTb.

So you probably want something like:

I think everything looks awesome except "http://10.0.2.2:8080/gs-guide-websocket/websocket" should probably be "ws://10.0.2.2:8080/gs-guide-websocket/websocket" for the websocket.

The author of the librabry put this in their example code:

The extra width is due to the default padding and border of the box.

Set these to 0 to remove them and the input will be inside the table cell's borders.

I modified the SO answer in the question to an animation that works in jupyter and only required code for your code, and changed it to the axes format since I have no experience with pyplot format animations. The issue is due to the removal of the clearing of the graph. `axes[0].clear() is there to remove the previous graph element.

There are two main features of NSAsynchronousFetchRequest:

1. We don't need separated context (background, any) for it, meaning you can execute it on main view context everything else (like creating background context if needed, etc) will be done by API. Note: you still need to redirect to main thread in completion block, because it can be called on any queue.

2. We can track progress of fetching data directly via NSAsynchronousFetchResult.progress if there is fetchLimit set for initial request.

The solution was, as written in the comments:

1. Run the program in the Terminal, not in the QT Creator's Output Termina. In the output Terminal you cannot type any input.

2. Flush the buffer because the text lies in the buffer until a endl or a flush occurs.

down to the very bottom of the stack error:

In principle, that kind of approach does work: if you have a function f from a set A to a set B and an inverse function to it, you can prove bij_betw f A B (read: f is a bijection from A to B), and that then implies card A = card B.

However, there are a few comments that I have:

1. You should use bool lists instead of nat lists if you can only have 0 or 1 in them anyway.

2. It is usually better to use existing library functions than to define new ones yourself. Your two functions could be defined using library functions like this: