facebook-messenger | Definitely the best way to make Bots on Facebook Messenger with Ruby | Bot library

It's because you apply upper div .nav-conter to flex property and didn't initiate it inside the media query. Add the css like below. It will work as you intended.

After several days of unsuccessful research, I gave up hoping to get an answer here or on the Facebook Dev forum.

However this morning when I wanted to try again, I noticed that the "Page Inbox" option mysteriously appeared ...

So I think the main reason could be that I was using a Facebook Page and an app created on the same day and hadn't spent a lot of time setting up the Page. While waiting for a response to my problem, the only things I have changed are adding a username, profile picture, and banner.

Maybe it was necessary to add these (I am mainly thinking of the page username), maybe we just had to wait for some sort of "verifications" from the facebook side.

This screenshot is from the day this question was written: No "Page Inbox" option
And this one is from today: "Page Inbox" appeared

This topic arises from time-to-time, and it's important to realize that security can (and likely should) happen in different layers of your application.

When working in AWS, it's important you understand Identity and Access Management(IAM). IAM is what AWS uses to define access policies to resources throughout the AWS ecosystem.

IAM is extremely powerful, and can even be used to define which DynamoDB partition each of your users has access to! This may seem like the solution to your problem. However, it's unlikely your applications users are accessing DynamoDB directly. Instead, they are invoking an API, which executes a Lambda using a different IAM role than your user. So, what do you do?

Remember when I said security should happen at different layers of your application? Well, this is one of those times! Your application code should make decisions based on who is accessing the application and take appropriate action to allow/deny that access.

For example, your application might decide that users can only message people they are friends with. This is not something IAM is going to help you with. Instead, you need to implement the logic to enforce this business rule directly in your application code.

The moral of the story here is that there is no built-in mechanism to enforce all types of business rules your application may have.

If you are using Amplify, you should start by looking into Cognito for Auth. Cognito will help you set up permissions for users of your application using IAM roles (e.g. unauthenticated, authenticated, administrators, etc). These roles will let you define different IAM policies that grant your users a variety of permissions (e.g. access to API Gateway endpoints, specific S3 buckets and DynamoDB tables, etc).

Here is the official guide how to do that in java:

https://www.twilio.com/docs/libraries/java

Looks like it is a GDPR related issue: https://developers.facebook.com/docs/messenger-platform/europe-updates#nov-30th-2020

In the table Affected features and APIs with mitigations there is an entry for the checkbox plugin:

So we have no choice but to wait until facebook switches the service back on.

you can put 3rd class name into the class of the element.. on css add the new class below of what you have and add your style (the last style will overwrote the style's above)

I found a solution after reading the Facebook for Developers documentation.

Note that this solution works for Facebook chatbot and for Facebook Messenger

Facebook uses MQTT for Messenger Chats. Each "Chat" has a generated Topic, and all members in the Chat subscribe and Publish to that generated Topic. The MQTT Messenger Broker infrastructure is made up of "many" different Brokers, and a "Topic Director" steers the Chat MQTT packets to the Broker handling that chat.