guides | ManageIQ guides and developer documentation | Learning library

This is mostly just bad news.

Create React App's Tailwind support means that they will detect tailwind.config.js in the project and add tailwindcss to their existing postcss configuration. Source in CRA

The guide that Tailwind offers on their site creates a dummy postcss.config.js - Making changes in this file does not change the actual postcss configuration. (misleading if anything)

This is a known issue currently - Github discussion on Tailwind support PR between Adam Wathan (Tailwind founder) and Ian Sutherland (CRA maintainer). But it does not seem like there is an intention to be fixed soon.

If you want to use nesting (or any PostCSS plugin really) is to eject from CRA using:

In the new Gooogle Identity Services, the authentication moment and the authorization moment are separated. This means, GIS provides different APIs for websites to call on these two different moments. You cannot combine them together in one API call (and UX flow) any more.

In the authenction moment, users just sign in or sign up into your website (by leveraging the information shared by Google). The only decision users need to make is whether they want to sign in (or sign-up). No authorization-related decison need to make at this point.

In the authentication moment, users will see consistent One Tap or button UX across all websites (since the same scopes are requested implicitly). Consistence leads to more smoothly UX, which may further lead to more usage. With the consitent and optimized authentication UX (across all websites), users will have a better experience with federated sign-in.

After users sign-in, when you really want to load some data from a Google data service, you can call GIS authorization API to trigger an UX flow to allow end users to grant the permission. That's the authorization moment.

Currently (August 2021), only authentication API has been published. If your website only cares about authentication, you can migrate to GIS now. If you also need the authorization API, you have to wait for further notice.

This seems to a be a known issue with Rails 7 and Devise now. To fix it in the meantime simply add the following line to your devise.rb.

config.navigational_formats = ['*/*', :html, :turbo_stream]

Source: https://github.com/heartcombo/devise/issues/5439

Found the answer here -> https://github.com/storybookjs/storybook/issues/15336

The solution is simply to add the following to .storybook\main.js

React Router v6 splits apart the history into multiple pieces, for this use case the relevant parts are the navigator and the location. This change is hinted at in Use useNavigate instead of useHistory, and you can see it in the definition of the Navigator type used in the Router props:

This answer is accurate as of 19th January 2022.

Upon manual debug of this dataflow, I found that the issue is due to the dataflow job is looking for a schema with the exact same name as the value passed for the parameter databaseName and there was no other input parameter for the job using which we could pass a schema name. Therefore for this job to work, the tables will have to be created/imported into a schema with the same name as the database.

However, as @Iñigo González said this dataflow is currently in Beta and seems to have some bugs as I ran into another issue as soon as this was resolved which required me having to change the source code of the dataflow template job itself and build a custom docker image for it.

Does this achieve the behavior you need?

This is an interesting problem. The short answer: Yes, it's possible. But I don't see a way around hard coding the position of table and legend, which is ugly.

The suggestion below requires hard coding in three places. I am using {ggpubr} for the table, and {cowplot} for the stitching.

Another problem arises from the legend key spacing for vertical legends. This is still a rather unresolved issue for other keys than polygons, to my knowledge. The associated GitHub issue is closed The legend spacing is not a problem any more. Ask teunbrand, and he knows the answer.

Some other relevant comments in the code.

I've suggested "**/*.{js,vue}": ["npm run lint:js:fix"], first of, lint:js:fix is subjective and up to you. This is what Kent C Dodds is using, so I'm just naming it in the same way.

But you could totally have lint:watermelon-potato-hehe instead, doesn't matter.

Now, about your propositions:

1. "**/*.{vue,js,jsx,ts,tsx}": "npm run lint", this one is targeting more extensions, which is totally fine. You may not really use .tsx/.jsx since it's not really popular among Vue devs.
   About .ts itself, it may probably work good enough (maybe you'll need to add some plugins to your ESlint configuration). I'm not into TS so I can't really help on this one but it's out of the husky/lint-staged scope anyway.
   Last time I started a Vue3 project, I've used Vitesse which has some nice defaults with TS, this may be a good start for you maybe.

As for the second part, since I like to setup my own ESlint config, with some simple and well documented API, we're using eslint --ext .js,.vue --fix. That way I'm sure of what is happening and how to troubleshoot it if needed.
vue-cli-service lint may be a good default package aimed towards Vue with some defaults, I'm not sure what's inside it and even if it's probably just an ESlint with some baked-in configuration, again we prefer to make our own Vue configuration with vanilla ESlint.

So yeah, if you need to go fast, use vue-cli-service lint for some quick linting, if you want to have a better flow in your project and want to fine grain your config, use vanilla ESlint, you'll get less trouble overall IMO.

1. "**/*.{vue,js,jsx,ts,tsx}": "eslint --ext .vue,.js,.jsx,.ts,.tsx --fix". On the right side, we globally have the same lint:js:fix scripts but with additional extensions.

So, you may ask why are we even writing the extensions on the left side for lint-staged and on the right side for lint:js:fix? I'd answer that those are not really needed on the right side (AFAIK), because lint-staged will only run the command to the left list of extensions.
Here, we wanted to be more explicit about the exact extensions we're targeting and also, it enables you to run npm run lint:js:fix in your CLI at any given point without getting errors on files ESlint is not handling (.txt, .json, .md, .jpg etc...).
So it could maybe be removed (not sure), fastest way to be sure is to try!

1. "**/*.{vue,js,jsx,ts,tsx}": "eslint --fix", this one may work fine as explained in the previous paragraph. Didn't tried it myself thought.

Regarding .html, you should not have a lot of those in your Vue project. You could use the W3C validator to check for any errors if you really need it.
If you're speaking about your HTML in the template tags in your .vue files, those will be ESlint'ed properly. If you setup a Prettier on top of it, you will also get some nice auto-formatting which is really awesome to work with (once your team has agreed on a .prettierrc config).

Regarding .json files, those are not handled by ESlint. ESlint is only for JavaScript-ish files. If you want to lint/format your .json or even any other extensions at all, you can aim towards NPM, find a package that suits your team's needs and add it to your chain like "**/*.json": ["npm run lint-my-json-please"] and you should be good!

At the end, husky + lint-staged are not doing anything special really. They are tools to automate what you could write yourself in a CLI, so if it's working when done manually and you're happy with the result, you can put it in your config but you need to first found what the proper package and it's configuration.

In your package.json, you could have the following