nao | Repository for NAO . | Robotics library

Problem seems to be that you are trying to set the color on the tr and not the td, so add .find("td") before your .css('color', 'red')

Demo

The core of the problem here is that Success and Notifier are both structurally the same, so TypeScript thinks that if the following if statement has a chance of returning true for one of those classes, it would return true for both:

if(result.isFailure())

Hence, the result value type after this block is automatically inferred as never. I have created an example to illustrate this here.

This problem can easily be fixed by introducing a unique field/method within one of the two classes or alternatively adding a private field/method.

The explanation above will fix the issue you are having and can be used to describe the behaviour of the if(result.isFailure()) statement. However, if(result.isSuccess()) on the other hand still appears to work with your original code. The reason for that is because you have introduced dynamicity in the order of how the nested generic types are assigned to the extending classes:

extends ResultAbstract vs extends ResultAbstract

Given the above, the classes can be considered to be different, however TypeScript will still think that Success and Notifier are the same as the is predicates tell it that Success can be Notifier (via the isFailure method) and Notifier can be Success (via the isSuccess method). Hence, all you need to do is remove either the isSuccess or the isFailure method and the code will start to work as it will tell TypeScript that it can only be one. Because your code only uses two classes, this would be the most suitable solution.

I solved the error weeks ago with the following registry keys:

I do not know what is wrong, perhaps something wrong with id I think.

Can you try change this line in checkout/templates/checkout/checkout.html:

I had the same issue and I changed

This XPath,

"gfortran: comando não encontrado": The gfortran compiler is missing.

On Linux, R builds packages from source. Therefore you need the gcc toolchain. To get the bare minimum, you may do:

Instead of using

I MUST maintain this line where she is.

That directive does not need to go inside the WordPress code block. You should place that directive before the # BEGIN WordPress comment marker. And this will prevent it from being overwritten by WordPress. In fact, you could place your custom rules at the very top of the file to make them easier to find/maintain.

It will work exactly the same.

You do not need to enclose it in an container like the other directives. And you should not repeat the RewriteEngine On and RewriteBase / directives. (The order of these particular directives do not matter. In fact, the last instance "wins" and controls the entire file.)

For example: