swift-algorithms | Commonly used sequence and collection algorithms for Swift | Learning library
kandi X-RAY | swift-algorithms Summary
kandi X-RAY | swift-algorithms Summary
Swift Algorithms is an open-source package of sequence and collection algorithms, along with their related types. Read more about the package, and the intent behind it, in the announcement on swift.org.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of swift-algorithms
swift-algorithms Key Features
swift-algorithms Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on swift-algorithms
QUESTION
I'm using the chunked method in Swift Algorithms.
When I work on a Range, it's pretty easy to handle the resulting type:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-08 at 18:34Barring a more authoritative answer, here is a workaround:
QUESTION
Not only "swift-algorithms" but also "swift-collections" which is announced yesterday are so amazing library I think.
I wonder why apple didn't include that libraries in official swift.
Maybe you who will answer to me absolutely don't know too. If you don't know, could you tell me if developer teams of each of library is different with developer team of official swift?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Apr-06 at 11:16They're both not in the swift standard library (yet) because they haven't passed the Swift Evolution process. This is explained in the Swift Algorithms announcement:
It’s our ambition for the standard library to include a rich, pragmatic set of generic algorithms. We think the Algorithms package can help realize this goal by serving as a low-friction venue to build out new families of related algorithms—giving us an opportunity to iteratively explore the problem space and learn how different algorithms connect and interact—before graduating them into the standard library.
QUESTION
I came across a question on StackOverflow: Swift - Convert Array to Dictionary where the user wants to take the elements of an array and wants to put them in a dictionary and assign 0 to each of them. (Key as Players and value as their scores) So:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-24 at 20:03Generally speaking you should prefer the functional idiom (ie reduce) over the for loop, for a couple of reasons:
- The functional version conveys intent. In this case we are reducing an array into a dictionary -- not the best example, but usually reduce transforms a vector into a single scalar through some combining function.
The functional version is correct by default since its been tested. This may seem trivial in the case of reduce, but its much less so if you look at something like
shuffled
. How easily can you look at a for loop and tell me if its performing a Fisher Yates shuffle and if that shuffle is implemented correctly? Similarly a pipeline of functions is much easier to read than a bunch of sequential for loops or a single for loop that does 5 different things.The functional version is often (but not in this case) immutable and immutable values are easier to reason about than mutable state, because they never change.
The functional methods on
Swift.Sequence
mostly have analogous methods onCombine.Publisher
. That means you can use a single set of functional idioms across all sequences, whether or not they are synchronous or asynchronous/reactive.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install swift-algorithms
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page