away | Generates CLLocation with a given distance | iOS library

If the problem did end up being from heap overuse (from strncat), then you could try out this implementation that uses the return from sprintf to append to the string as your building it.

This was difficult for me to understand, so I wanted to share if anyone else has the same issue.

It seems that an async method will break a method chain, there's no way around that. And since fetch is asynchronous, await must be used, and in order for await to be used, the calling method must be declared async. Thus the method chain will be broken.

The way the method chain is called must be changed.

In my OP, I linked https://jsfiddle.net/47sfj3Lv/3/ as a much simpler version of the same problem. StackOverflow's 'fiddle' effectively blocks 'fetch' for security reasons, so I need to use JSFiddle for demonstration.

Here's a working version of the same code using then and how/why it works, and a slightly shorter version, because await can be specified with the the fetch, obviously.

You don't actually need javascript. A simple link will do. You can also do it with javascript, but I see no reason to in this case.

This would work:

Divs and selects aren't self-closing elements. They probably don't exist with respect to jQuery except where the browser attempts to close them for you. Fix that and it works.

Your #olark-box-wrapper is a div with position:absolute; top: 0; height:100%; z-index:9999999999; ... no wonder it's taking up the full height of the right window area on top of everything else. And even though it's a transparent div, mouse clicks are handled by the event handlers of that div, not by those of the elements below it.

You could add pointer-events: none; to that div, making it "transparent" to user interaction. You may have to add pointer-events: visible; to its childs, to avoid the pointer-events: none; attribute being inherited by the children.

Alternatively, you could change the layout so that the #olark-box-wrapper is exactly the same height as its children.

One note about your choice of z-index: this number might be a bit too high, see Minimum and maximum value of z-index? (tl;dr: keep it in the range of a signed 32-bit number).

fromCallable doesn't shield you from blocking computation inside the Callable, which your example demonstrates.

The primary mean of cancellation in Reactive Streams is the cancel() signal propagated from downstream via the Subscription.

Even with that, the fundamental requirement of avoiding blocking code inside reactive code still holds, because if the operators are simple enough (ie. synchronous), a blocking step could even prevent the propagation of the cancel() signal...

A way to adapt non-reactive code while still getting notified about cancellation is Mono.create: it exposes a MonoSink (via a Consumer) which can be used to push elements to downstream, and at the same time it has a onCancel handler.

You would need to rewrite your code to eg. check an AtomicBoolean on each iteration of the loop, and have that AtomicBoolean flipped in the sink's onCancel handler:

Use onViewableItemsChanged this is called when the items in the flatlist changes.

CupertinoButton has a default padding 16 for all sides. Hence, when you scaledown with SizedBox, the child still remain in its original position.

From cupertinobutton source code:

You didn't describe omitting pg_replslot during your rsync, as the docs recommend. If you didn't omit it, then now your replica has a replication slot which is a clone of the one on the master. But if nothing ever connects to that slot on the replica and advances the cutoff, then the WAL never gets released to recycling. To fix you just need to shutdown the replica, remove that directory, restart it, (and wait for the next restart point to finish).

Do they need to go to wal_archive folder on the disk just like they go to wal_archive folder on the master node?

No, that is optional not necessary. It is set by archive_mode = always if you want it to happen.