scoredata | expose data from scoreboard controllers | Model View Controller library

I assume that setScoreData([...score, {Some New data}]) should be setScoreData([...scoreData, {Some New data}])

Your setInterval receives a closure with fixed scoreData and keeps calling it. So setScoreData([...scoreData, {Some New data}]) always sets the same data. In your case it is better to fix this issue with useRef hook:

Do you want to convert that particular object to above specified format ? If so, you can do it like this :

There is nothing related to JSON, you should add the proper value to the list

So first make sure a rigidbody is attached so a collision can be recognized.

Note: I am only trying to test process() method here. But process method is calling a private method from inside. I want to be able to return a mock value for private method rather than executing the private method.

You should not do that because MyClass is your class under test. You cannot cover the logic inside the private methods with tests if you stub them. Instead, you should make sure that the injected mocks behave the way you want them to (via stubbed methods) if they are used inside those private method. Unfortunately you decided not to show that crucial part of your code even though the exact answer depends on it. Instead you replaced them with comments "some business logic", which is not very helpful because your business logic is what you want to test. You don't want to stub it out.

So please don't do what I am showing you here, I am answering only because you asked.

In order to stub a method it must not be private because spies, mocks or stubs technically are always subclasses or the originals and subclasses cannot inherit or even call private methods. Thus, you need to make the methods protected (so subclasses can use or override them) or package-scoped. I recommend the former.

But you cannot use a normal mock or stub as a stand-in for your class under test because you only want to stub out part of the business logic (your two methods in question), not the whole logic (you want to keep process()). Thus, you need a partial mock. For this purpose you can use a spy.

Dummy dependency classes:

Spring documentation is a good starting point for learning web socket concepts. For sending to client you can use SimpMessageSendingOperations.

Because just declaring an index of a specific size does not create any element of type HighScore,. Instead you just reserve some memory. In other words: just because you have a bag does not put any potatoes in it. You have to go to the market and put potatoes into your bag yourself.

You could even create an instance of a derived class and put it into the exact same array. How would the compiler in this case know which class you want to instantiate?

Here's the CORS configuration I'm currently using for NGINX. You should be able to fix your issue by replacing your add_header attempt with it.

For JsonUtility the field names in your classes have to match with the ones in your JSON string. Otherwise the "missing" fields will simply have their default value (in your case "").

So from the naming in your JSON example

• in the class Values it should rather be