ghr | Upload multiple artifacts to GitHub Release in parallel | Architecture library

Please see the below snippet.

Assuming that what you have in your input are the strings in the column of interest of 4 rows. You can remove the duplicate substrings as follows:

The Scanner uses a buffer. It’s default size is 1024 characters. So by the first nextLine() call, it reads up to 1024 of the available characters into the buffer. This is necessary, as the Scanner doesn’t even know how many characters belong to the next line, before filling the buffer and searching for a line break in the buffer.

Therefore, if there are less pending characters than the buffer size, the loop will iterate only once. But even when there are more characters, and more loop iterations, the resulting state likely is to have some pending lines in the buffer.

As long as the Scanner’s buffer is in its initial empty state, you can flush the source stream directly, instead of using the scanner:

You need to add "is-invalid" class to the input to invalidate for ABN via javascript.

You forgot to consider non-consecutive sub-strings. An easy way to do this is with itertools.

You'll likely need to do something which tests each time. I would use a Do..Until loop like this:

There's not really a simple way to do this.

The problem with your current query is that it assigns passengers to all trains which has t.departure_time after p.departure_time, but we only want the passenger to catch the first train after p.departure_time.

You start by calculating all of the trains each passenger can catch, and then you narrow it down.

Query to select all trains that a passenger can catch:

Indeed, subtracting 1016 is not going to prevent overflow:

Consider when GHR = 1021, then the next round it will become 2042 (because of the shift). Subtract 1016 from that and you get 1026...

It is not clear why you chose the number 1016. To restrict a number to its 7 least significant bits, you could use either the modulo (%) or bitwise AND operator (&):

I think the big issue here is a slight mistake in usage of the conditional procedures.

If you want to return anything in the conditional queries back out, you need to explicitly RETURN it in the query.

Also, the value that is returned is a map containing the values returned by the query, it isn't the value itself. It looks like you were assuming that when doing a MERGE for a single thing that the single variable was implicitly returned and that it was accessible via value, but that is incorrect. A correct usage would be something like this: