ensemble | An experimental collectively designed multiplayer online | Game Engine library
kandi X-RAY | ensemble Summary
kandi X-RAY | ensemble Summary
Project Ensemble is an experiment in crowd design, where players, developers and artists collaborate to collectively design a browser-based multiplayer online game. For a detailed description of the project, visit the website.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of ensemble
ensemble Key Features
ensemble Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on ensemble
QUESTION
I have the following piece of code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-13 at 15:49Pipeline
is used to assemble several steps such as preprocessing, transformations, and modeling. StratifiedKFold
is used to split your dataset to assess the performance of your model. It is not meant to be used as a part of the Pipeline
as you do not want to perform it on new data.
Therefore it is normal to perform it out of the pipeline's structure.
QUESTION
I am trying to tune hyperparameters for HistGradientBoostingRegressor in sklearn and would like to know what possible values could be for l2_regularization
, the rest of the parameter grid that works for me looks like this -
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-12 at 09:55Indeed, Regularizations are constraints that are added to the loss function. The model when minimizing the loss function will have to also minimize the regularization term. Hence, This will reduce the model variance as it cannot overfit.
Acceptable parameters for l2_regularization
are often on a logarithmic scale between 0
and 0.1
, such as 0.1, 0.001, 0.0001
.
QUESTION
How to create a list with the y-axis labels of a TreeExplainer
shap chart?
Hello,
I was able to generate a chart that sorts my variables by order of importance on the y-axis. It is an impotant solution to visualize in graph form, but now I need to extract the list of ordered variables as they are on the y-axis of the graph. Does anyone know how to do this? I put here an example picture.
Obs.: Sorry, I was not able to add a minimal reproducible example. I don't know how to paste the Jupyter Notebook cells here, so I've pasted below the link to the code shared via Github.
In this example, the list would be "vB0 , mB1 , vB1, mB2, mB0, vB2".
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-09 at 16:36TL;DR
QUESTION
My code:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Jun-06 at 14:53This problem might occur when y_train is not of the type that is inputted into any classifier model. In this case, y_train was of the type Series. When I changed the type to a NumPy array, it worked fine. Here's the code:
QUESTION
I have an object with a structure similar to:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 14:21Can you try this for debug?
QUESTION
I'm failing to process the below code in the pipeline (it's imblearn
pipepline)
ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-31 at 10:26This is happening because you have a text transformer object in your pipeline. The problem with this approach is that the pipeline will pass the whole dataframe to the TfidfVectorizer
. However, the text transformers of scikit-learn
expect a 1d input.
Passing a 2d dataframe to TfidfVectorizer
causes some weird processing where it mistakes the column names as documents. You can check with this simple example:
QUESTION
I'm trying to classify a text to a 6 different classes. Since I'm having an imbalanced dataset, I'm also using SMOTETomek method that should synthetically balance the dataset with additional artificial samples.
I've noticed a huge score difference when applying it via pipeline vs 'Step by step" where the only difference is (I believe) the place I'm using train_test_split
Here are my features and labels:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-29 at 13:28There is nothing wrong with your code by itself. But your step-by-step approach is using bad practice in Machine Learning theory:
Do not resample your testing data
In your step-by-step approach, you resample all of the data first and then split them into train and test sets. This will lead to an overestimation of model performance because you have altered the original distribution of classes in your test set and it is not representative of the original problem anymore.
What you should do instead is to leave the testing data in its original distribution in order to get a valid approximation of how your model will perform on the original data, which is representing the situation in production. Therefore, your approach with the pipeline is the way to go.
As a side note: you could think about shifting the whole data preparation (vectorization and resampling) out of your fitting and testing loop as you probably want to compare the model performance against the same data anyway. Then you would only have to run these steps once and your code executes faster.
QUESTION
I am trying to evaluate a model with 2 inputs and 1 output, each input goes to separate pretrained model and then the output from both the models get averaged. I am using the same data for both the inputs.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-20 at 11:33Try calling the evaluate() like this:
QUESTION
I have trained two keras models with different datasets for same class labels. How could I ensemble the models keras_model.h5 and keras_model2.h5 together and make another keras model say keras_ensemble.h5. I have tried referring various internet sources but not luck. Can someone help me with the code for ensembling it? Here are the models I've trained
Please assist me through this.Thank you.
Edit: This was my code which i was able to get through with the help of the one who responded to my question Frightera
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-22 at 09:40You can average-ensemble them like this:
QUESTION
I was using tpotClassifier() and got the following pipeline as my optimal pipeline. I am attaching my pipeline code which I got. Can someone explain the pipeline processes and order?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-May-20 at 14:28make_union
just unions multiple datasets, and FunctionTransformer(copy)
duplicates all the columns. So the nested make_union
and FunctionTransformer(copy)
makes several copies of each feature. That seems very odd, except that with ExtraTreesClassifier
it will have an effect of "bootstrapping" the feature selections. See also Issue 581 for an explanation for why these are generated in the first place; basically, adding copies is useful in stacking ensembles, and the genetic algorithm used by TPOT means it needs to generate those first before exploring such ensembles. There it is recommended that doing more iterations of the genetic algorithm may clean up such artifacts.
After that things are straightforward, I guess: you perform a univariate feature selection, and fit an extra-random trees classifier.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install ensemble
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page