commit4 | 🎮 Winner of Game Off | Game Engine library
kandi X-RAY | commit4 Summary
kandi X-RAY | commit4 Summary
Winner of Game Off 2017.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of commit4
commit4 Key Features
commit4 Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on commit4
QUESTION
I am trying to squash the following commits 1,2,3,4 and 5. The rests of the commits are comming from the a merge of develop branch with my branch. I used the following command line:
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jun-18 at 14:37I don't understand why I am getting a dead code. And how can I fix it?
The error message is a bit confusing, what you see is in fact a Git conflict (see this post of this post) and Remove dead code
is simply the commit message associated with commit 2baa...
which cannot be rebased because of said conflict.
You do not have a "dead code" issue, that's simply some message associated to the conflicting commit.
You should:
- Resolve the conflict locally
- Run
git rebase --continue
once conflict is solved
QUESTION
I have a local branch in my computer but I would like to create a new branch with no history at all (just one commit initially) and using this new branch on the remote side. How can I do that?
For example local branch has:
commit1, commit2, commit3
But I want my new branch to have only commit0 that is the code of the last state (commit3), with no previous history. I wish then to merge stuff easily for example if I do commit4 in my local branch, I wish to have only commit0 and commit4 changes in the remote branch.
How the best way to achieve this? I want mainly "compress" the stuff in the remote branch and not necessarely erase the history in my local one, to be able to still work on the local one.
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Apr-21 at 20:35I want my new branch to have only commit0 that is the code of the last state (commit3), with no previous history.
You can get this pretty easily:
QUESTION
This is after git svn dcommit
:
ANSWER
Answered 2020-Feb-03 at 10:26The comment by laurent is right.
Client side history rewrite is not possible with svn
, one would require admin rights for this work.
QUESTION
commit5 master
commit4
commit3
commit2 git-svn
commit1
...ANSWER
Answered 2020-Jan-30 at 12:37Ok it was fairly simple.
QUESTION
The graph is supposed to represent a system similar to github, with commits (commit1, commit2, commit3 and commit4), documents (d1, d2) and changes on those documents (green nodes).
I am trying to use CYPHER to get all the documents values at a specific commit. In other words, I am trying to find the shortest path between the specific commit and each of the documents on my graph, but avoiding some paths.
Imagine if I am on commit4
, d1
should be equal to foo2
and d2
should be equal to spain
. This could be solved with the following CYPHER query:
ANSWER
Answered 2019-Dec-11 at 21:39From what you explained, I understand that you don't want to traverse the FOLLOWS
edge in the opposite direction of the edge. To do so you can use cypher projection in algo.shortestPath
:
QUESTION
I have the following:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Oct-16 at 08:13All you would need to do is to take a pull from branch 1 into branch 2
Step:
QUESTION
My Master branch history looks like below
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Sep-20 at 02:44Github compare does the same as git diff master...branch-from-commit3
, which is the following: It looks for the first commit that is reachable from commit3
, but not from master
and then displays the diff between that commit and commit3
. In your case there is no such commit, so the difference is empty.
Why does it behave that way? Because this way you get all the changes on your branch that have not yet been merged to master. So it's kind of like a merge preview.
git diff master..branch-from-commit3
on the other hand compares the contents of commit3
with the contents of the tip of master, which seems to be what you are looking for.
QUESTION
In chronological order I have the following commits:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Aug-05 at 15:26In terms of the final change, merging the second one into the first is the same as merging the first into the second. The only difference is the message.
In the interactive rebase editor (from git rebase -i
), mark commit2
and commit3
as squash
to squash them into commit1
, then when it offers you the chance to edit the commit message, delete the first two bits.
QUESTION
I cannot find a good match for this, but there must be a shorter way of doing this... Say we have a sub-tree of a project, picking one at random here, as a local repository and I want to rewind back to the December 11th revision 6b6e73b3e77176a8a80ae01a1844914102728acd, that is undo the six (at the time of writing) commits above. From reading the docs, I know I could do:
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Feb-20 at 01:49I've experimented and come to the conclusion this is not a good idea, but in the spirit of sharing, this is what I came up with. First, to get a list of versions to revert, I did:
QUESTION
I want to select particular set of commits to be cherry-picked to a new branch.
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Nov-20 at 14:07tl;dr: probably better to use git rebase -i
I don't guess I see what you expect to get out of tagging. To avoid saying
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install commit4
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page