domain | free package to help building | Architecture library

This sample shows how to implement your first option. The technique is called "home realm discovery". https://github.com/azure-ad-b2c/samples/tree/master/policies/home-realm-discovery-modern

I'm assuming you have missing dependencies on your code generation class path. Once you update your question, I'll update my answer.

jOOQ won't support your generated composite types in generated code out of the box, you'll still have to add forced type configurations for that, possibly embeddable type configurations:

• https://www.jooq.org/doc/latest/manual/code-generation/codegen-advanced/codegen-config-database/codegen-database-forced-types/
• https://www.jooq.org/doc/latest/manual/code-generation/codegen-embeddable-types/

Note that the JPADatabase offers a quick win by integrating with simple JPA defined schemas very quickly. It has its caveats. For best results, I recommend going DDL first (and generate both jOOQ code and JPA model from that), because it will be much easier to put your schema change management under version control, e.g. via Flyway or Liquibase.

This may not answering your question but have you tried console.log(response.data) before setItem(response.data) to check the data you get from axios.get? sometimes console.log can help

Use inheritance very carefully. Prefer association over inheritance whenever your inheritance is not a permanent truth from the birth to the death of an object. ANd keep in mind that dependencies between classes do not make any promises about objects of those classes.

Some clarifications on the UML syntax:

• I understand that your plain thick lines ended with a small hollow triangle represent a specialization/generalization relationship (aka inheritance). If this is correct, the triangle should be larger to avoid visual confusion. Moreover multiplicity makes no sense with inheritance and should be removed.
• I understand that with the dotted line you intend to represent an association with multiplicity. If this is correct:
  • the association should be plain lines, because dotted lines are for dependencies, and multiplicity would make no sense.
  • the meaning you give to the arrow head would be unclear. Do you use them to document navigability? In case of doubt, remove them. If you want to document ownership of the association end, use the dot notation instead. (we cannot say if it’s right or wrong, since it’s a decision on how your model sees the associations)

In view of your comments and the third model linked therein, there are some key UML semantics you need to keep in mind:

• Inheritance is an ultra-strong relationship which means "is (always) a". In your example, you may say that an Actor is always a Person, and hence, everything you say about a Person is also true for an Actor. By the way, you should avoid repeating inherited properties or methods, since it could create some ambiguity.
• Inheritance is not a substitute for aggregation, composition or association. You can for example not say that a CrewMember (one person) is always a Crew (a group of persons). A CrewMember belongs to a Crew but there are things that the crew can do together that the individual member can't.
• Inheritance is not suitable if it's not always true. A Character for example may often be a Person. But not always;: you can have ghost characters, comic characters, robot characters, or animals.
• Association means that there is some structural relation between some instances of the associated classes. For example, that one ore several persons live in one city, seems a very relevant assocaition.
• Dependency means that a class is dependent on another, i.e. without the other class it would not work or something would be missing. It's a statement about the classes and not the objects. I.e. If you meant to say that Person is dependent on City you just say that the class Person would not work without knowing about City (for example, because the operation sendPostCardFrom(city: City) needs an argument of that type) but you do not say anything about persons X, Y and Z. If you want that X, Y and Z are related to city a, b, and c, you need an association.

About the model content, I'll not decide for you and there is no single truth. I therefore prefer to draw your attention at potential issues. I raise them in form of a question, up-to you to adjust the model based on your own answer:

• Common issues between the both variants:

  • Are Actor and Director really Persons ? In this case, what with the Persons that are Actors and Directors at the same time (g.g. Clint Eastwood) ? Or are Actor and Director just roles that a Persons takes for a given Movie ?
  • Is a Character really related only to 1 Movie? What to do with Indiana Jones, where the same character appears in several movies?
  • In a similar way, I wonder if there's really a single Person who lives in a City or if this should not be a many-to-many association?

• Issues regarding the differences: `

  • Is a Person in version 1 a Character (inheritance) ? Or is a Character a representation of a Person (association: represents) ?
  • Is a Character in version 2 really an Actor and by transitivity also a Person (inheritance)? Or is the Character only associated with an Actor (association: plays) ?

It's up to you to decide, but wherever I asked a question about association or inheritance, you should better think twice before using inheritance (i.e. prefer association/composition over inheritance)

Look at the documentation:

There appear to be two key issues:

Enter/Update/Exit

The exit selection only contains elements when there are selected elements in the DOM which do not have corresponding items in the data array. In your case we have an empty selection with bound data:

Here I'm wondering about the line [in s_client]
New, TLSv1/SSLv3, Cipher is ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384

You're apparently using OpenSSL 1.0.2, where that's a basically useless relic. Back in the days when OpenSSL supported SSLv2 (mostly until 2010, although almost no one used it much after 2000), the ciphersuite values used for SSLv3 and up (including all TLS, but before 2014 OpenSSL didn't implement higher than TLS1.0) were structured differently than those used for SSLv2, so it was important to qualify the ciphersuite by the 'universe' it existed in. It has almost nothing to do with the protocol version actually used, which appears later in the session-param decode:

The shape of b is (1,10) and the shape of the expression is (10). It will work if you do