solstice | Remake of Equinox - This remake is made with Python | Game Engine library

I'm coding this for my class but I cannot figure out how to split using range.

find spell_list length use range() to iterate each half of spell_list
label & print the first and second halves

spell_list = ["Tuesday", "Wednesday", "February", "November", "Annual", "Calendar", "Solstice"]

So I am trying to do a seasons homework in Python by putting the Seasons and Solstice Dates in for it, but when I run it, I keep getting "Invalid" when I try putting the month and the day in. Here is my code for reference:

I have an CSV file that contains name of some series, her worth and her genre.

Example:

Hi I am trying to create a new column in my data frame to say "if 'SightDate' is between 7-15 and 2-15 return TRUE 1 else FALSE [0]" but can't seem to find the syntax for date functions in r. This is what I have so far.

I am experiencing unexpected behaviour with the php function array_merge_recursive. Any advice or work-around would be appreciated.

The problem is with unexpected replacement of string keys with numeric key during the array_merge_recursive.

Details:

I have three associative arrays ($birthdays,$custom,$natHolidays), to which these values are programmatically added:

I have a code that goes like that:

This is probably a really simple answer, but I have been trying every variation to pull the Current Song / Artist from shoutcast data. My code is:

I googled for a few days now and can't seem to find an answer.

How can I change the variable name of a pojo class to display a user input instead?

Here is the code:

I am looking to calculate the highest precision lat lon for the subsolar point, in a particular datetime moment, as is reasonably possible using pyephem, with the help of some other library(s) if they are needed.

Relevant context: Anyone who has used pyephem, already knows that for certain calculations it requires certain setup values before computing body positions, those values including the datetime (epoch of the observation), the location of the observer, and of course, the body being investigated. Solutions for the subsolar point through the use of pyephem, that I have found online, show the time in utc as the time needed for the pyephem setup.

Remembering way back to my first exposure to astronomy, and to celestial navigation, utc is a variant of a mean day, compared to an actual solar day, where an actual solar day's duration throughout the year varies due to several factors of the nature of the earth's orbit. Because the length of an actual solar day varies throughout the year, for certain types of astronomical calculations, this requires the Equation of Time to more precisely map the actual solar day measurements to a mean and fixed 24 hour day system such as utc. Before the advent of sufficiently accurate 'pendulum movement' clock mechanisms, and now crystal controlled clock mechanisms, going back to when sundials were the accurate timepiece, the more sophisticated sundials included markings to apply a yearly approximation of this important Equation of Time, soon after it had been observed and definitively documented. Therefore, relevant to my question, since utc is a variant of mean day, and not the true solar day, but normalized to 24 hours exactly, there is this question now of how or if pyephem incorporates the Equation of Time in its right ascension solutions for the sun. At present, I imagine the EoT is required for accuracy, as I try to visualize the sun's position against the background of stars, as seen from the earth, as the earth revolves around the sun, with historically observed variations that are made available and useful and essential with the Equation of Time.

Summary then of my question:

If it is not necessary to explicitly enter an EoT value in pyephem, because it is not relevant for computing the most accurate subsolar point, please explain why. If it is relevant, as I presently think it is, please tell me if pyephem, in its right acension calculation of the sun (and other bodies), as a body, does in fact, apply the Equation of Time as appropriate. Does it do so transparently? Is there a way to input an explicit value for it, if such is known, an EoT value that might be more accurate or more up to date compared to what pyephem is using transparently?

Some initial research results that formed the question: Upon doing a search through various search engines, I found several posts in topical forums that give what seems a very simple answer for finding the subsolar point. Finding the lattitude apears to be the less complicated part of the solution, being simply the computed declination. Finding the longitude is where the question arose in my thinking, and now I wonder if it is applicable for the declination as well, since using the properly precise time is essential for the most precise result of both declination(lat) and longitude of the subsolar point. I always applied the EoT from the Nautical Almanac, back when I was involved with celestial navigation.

Two links, specific to pyephem, present the same approach to the subsolar point solution. When the question(s) was first asked, Brandon Rhodes quickly presented the single line formula using pyephem's computing of the sun's right ascension. His was specifically the code for the longitude calculation in a more theoretical tone, without all the pyephem contextual details. Liam Kennedy presented a more complete context of python code, showing those additional pyephem details, so that one could 'copy and paste' the entire block of code, (needing only to add the import ephem and import datetime), and modify it as appropriate, which I also found to be a useful review. The code is from these links...

Computing sub-solar point

Confusion with using dec/ra to compute sub-lunar location

subsolar point:

Brandon's code