curiosity | A Skype bot with rudimentary plug-in support | Bot library

You can vectorize the calculation using numpy:

In your case, "Data Validation" has been used:

1. Select the range you want to have the desired behavior
2. From the "Data" Tab, Choose "Data Validation"
3. See Full Description

Similar behavior is achievable in "Developer Mode" as well:

1. First Enable the Developer Tab from "File->Options->Customize Ribbon"
2. Put into "Design Mode"
3. Add Appropriate control (e.g.: Combo-box) via "Insert" button.
4. Complete documentation is available here

You’re charged for the cumulative space.

Taking your example, for the first month you’ll not be charged anything as you’ve only stored 5GB data.

In the 2nd month you added 5GB more so the total data stored is 10GB. Considering first 5GB is free, you’ll only be charged for 5GB.

UPDATE

To answer your additional questions

So lets suppose the storage for the first month is over the free tier, say 5TB and 5TB more the next month, now the capacity cost next month is on 10TB or just the 5TB?

Storage costs are calculated on the total amount of data stored. In this case you will be charged for 10TB as the total amount of data stored in that month is 10TB (5TB from previous month + 5TB in the current month).

if I keep storing 5TB every month, it would be significantly more than the case where I keep archiving the old 5TB every month, is that so

That is correct. I am assuming that by archiving you mean that you will be moving the data in archive access tier. Please note that you will still be charged for the data that is there in the archive access tier. It's just that you will be charged lesser for the data that's there in that tier but you will be charged as Azure Storage is storing that data for you.

To stop paying for the data storage costs, you will need to delete the data.

Query parameters are sent as strings. Therefore it needs to be casted to assign to a number type.

The csv package supports only one type of comment line. Choose one, and then delete the other. For instance:

In the C standard, Section 6.3.1.8 describes "Usual arithmetic conversions." (Added in C99, link is to C11 draft)

Many operators that expect operands of arithmetic type cause conversions and yield result types in a similar way. The purpose is to determine a common real type for the operands and result.

The C99 Rationale V5.10 describes the reason for this as:

Explicit license was added to perform calculations in a “wider” type than absolutely necessary, since this can sometimes produce smaller and faster code, not to mention the correct answer more often. Calculations can also be performed in a “narrower” type by the as if rule so long as the same end result is obtained. Explicit casting can always be used to obtain a value in a desired type.

From the rationale, it is reasonable to infer the committee sees this as the simplest solutions that captures the greatest number of possible uses.

From a simplicity standpoint, having a rank-by-rank promotion system would greatly increase the detail required to implement the standard. It would also create a wide variation of performance issues between platforms of different bit sizes. Programmers seeking to achieve specific objectives with data types are still given that flexibility through explicit casting of types.

It's useful when you have a class hierarchy, and you want to be able to write methods in the base class which return instances of the derived class (such as this):

This is a bad way to work with props

Note: do not focus on Dev Tools too much as it can be "buggy" at times - especially if you use Vue in a wrong way. Focus on your app output

1. Your Card.vue component is modifying (push) a prop, which is not recommended but it sort of works if the prop is object/Array and you do not replace it, just modify it's content (as you do)
2. But in your case, the values passed to props are actually generated by a method! The getUserLinksFromUserId method is generating a new array every time it is called, and this array is NOT reactive. So by pushing to it, your component will not re-render and what is worse, parent's links array is not changed at all! (on top of that - if App.vue ever re-renders, it will generate new arrays, pass it to pros and your modified arrys will be forgoten)

So intead of modifying links prop in Card.vue, just emit an event and do the modification in App.vue

I was finally able to create a working solution with a bit of hackery around the "magic" Bash completion variables. I changed these variables to "pretend" we were completing the given command as given to git itself.

If anybody has any suggestions to simplify this I would totally be open to suggestions.