doRNG | R package - Generic Reproducible Parallel Backend | Architecture library

 by   renozao R Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | doRNG Summary

kandi X-RAY | doRNG Summary

doRNG is a R library typically used in Architecture applications. doRNG has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

This doRNG package provides functions to perform reproducible parallel foreach loops, using independent random streams as generated by L'Ecuyer's combined multiple-recursive generator [L'Ecuyer (1999)]. It enables to easily convert standard %dopar% loops into fully reproducible loops, independently of the number of workers, the task scheduling strategy, or the chosen parallel environment and associated foreach backend. The package doRNG is available from CRAN at The development project is hosted on GitHub at
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              doRNG has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 15 star(s) with 1 fork(s). There are 2 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              There are 5 open issues and 13 have been closed. On average issues are closed in 134 days. There are 2 open pull requests and 0 closed requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of doRNG is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              doRNG has no bugs reported.

            kandi-Security Security

              doRNG has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.

            kandi-License License

              doRNG does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              doRNG releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of doRNG
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            doRNG Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for doRNG.

            doRNG Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for doRNG.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            How to get a reproducible result when using parallelization to do resampling with mlr3
            Asked 2021-Feb-17 at 09:18

            Recently I was learning about using mlr3 package with parallelization. As the introduction from mlr3 book (https://mlr3book.mlr-org.com/technical.html) and tutorial(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T43hO2o_nZw&t=1s), mlr3 uses the future backends for parallelization. I run a simple test with the following code:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Feb-17 at 06:56

            You need to set a seed with a RNG kind that supports parallelization.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66235355

            QUESTION

            R function loglik() returning -inf?
            Asked 2021-Jan-03 at 22:31

            Simulating an SIR model in R. I have a data set I am trying to plot accurately with the model. I am right now using the particle filter function, then would like to use the corresponding logLik method on the result. When I do this, I get "[1] -Inf" as a result. I can't find in the documentation why this is and how I can avoid it. Are my parameters for the model not accurate enough? Is there something else wrong?

            My function looks like this: SIRsim %>% pfilter(Np=5000) -> pf logLik(pf)

            From an online course lesson entitled Likelihood for POMPS https://kingaa.github.io/sbied/pfilter/ , this is the R script for the lesson. However, the code works here... I'm not sure how to reproduce my specific problem with it and unfortunately cannot share the dataset or code I am using because it is for academic research.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2021-Jan-03 at 22:31

            If I set Beta=100 in the code above I can get a negative-infinite log-likelihood.

            Replacing the measurement-error snippet with this:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65554258

            QUESTION

            Convert for loops into foreach loops
            Asked 2020-Dec-06 at 20:21

            I want to make the code below more efficient by using the foreach package. I tried it for a very long time but I don't manage to get the same result as when using the for-loops. I would like to use a nested foreach-loop including parallelization... And as output I would like to have two matrices with dim [R,b1] I would be very grateful for some suggestions!!

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Dec-05 at 11:18

            I created a foreach loop in following code. There had to be some changes made. It is a lot easier to return a list then a matrix in foreach, since it's combined with rbind. Especially when you want to return multiple ones. My solution here is to save everything in a list and afterwards transform it into a matrix of length 100.

            Note: there is one mistake in your code. summary( mod.lm.d)$coef[2,4] does not exist. I changed it to [2]. Adjust to your needing

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65078132

            QUESTION

            Debugging foreach in R using dorng
            Asked 2020-Oct-13 at 09:56

            I am parallelizing a task in R using foreach loop with reproducible results using the dorng operator. It is a complex code, and I have an error that I have not been able to identify even though I have run the same code with a regular for loop.

            My fundamental question is: how do I debug a function within of a foreach loop assuming that I have reproducible results? Below is my current tentative.

            In the vignette of the doRNG package, it says that a sequence of random seeds will be generated and set at the beginning of each iteration using the R number generator "L’Ecuyer-CMRG". The sequence of random seeds can be defined using set.seed before the foreach loop:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Oct-13 at 09:56

            I think the issue comes from the fact that doRNG gives you the random seed state and you're using that as the input of set.seed, which requires just an integer. I expect set.seed is only taking the first integer provided to the function to set the random seed state. Instead, what you should do is set the seed state in R. First I get the seed states and verify I can reproduce the error:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63126939

            QUESTION

            Multithread computation with R: how to get all different random numbers?
            Asked 2020-Jul-07 at 07:36

            Anyone knows how to get all the random numbers different in the following code? E.g. with doRNG package? I don't care about reproducibility.

            Edit: Duplicates by pure chance are accepted.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2020-Jul-06 at 20:31

            Modifying the "Hello World" example in the "getting started with doParallel" vignette to generate random numbers, I came up with:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62758637

            QUESTION

            Problem to reproduce results from parallelSVM in R
            Asked 2019-Sep-25 at 04:04

            I am not able to set a seed value to get reproducible results from parallelSVM().

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2019-Sep-25 at 01:38

            In short, there is no implemented method in parallelSVM to handle this issue. However the package uses the foreach and doParallel packages to handle it's parallel operations. And digging hard enough on stackoverflow a solution is possible!

            Credits to this answer, on the usage of the doRNG package, and this answer for giving me an idea for a simpler enclosed solution.

            Solution:

            In the parallelSVM package the parallelization happens through the parallelSVM::registerCores functions. This function simply calls doParallel::registerDoParallel with the number of cores, and no further arguments. My idea is simply to change the parallelSVM::registerCores function, such that it automatically sets the seed at after creating a new cluster.

            When performing parallel computation, in which you need a parallel seed, there are 2 things you need to ensure

            1. The seed needs to be given to each node in the cluster
            2. The generator needs to be one that is asymptotically random across clusters.

            Luckily the doRNG package handles the first and uses a seed that which is alright on 2. Using a combination of unlockNamespace and assign we can overwrite the parallelSVM::registerCores, such that it includes a call to doRNG::registerDoRNG with the appropriate seed (function at the end of answer). Doing this we can actually get proper reproducibility as illstrated below:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58089031

            QUESTION

            Cannot find function "%dorng%" in R
            Asked 2018-Oct-13 at 18:34

            I have a problem with R. This function when is invoked gives me

            "could not find function "%dorng%"

            Am I missing some packages or what?

            I have done install.packages("doRNG") which was successfully installed. EDIT: the same with installing rngtools and foreach.

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2018-Oct-13 at 18:34

            install package doRNG and attach the library:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52795864

            QUESTION

            dorng parallel computing and store elapsed time negative value in R
            Asked 2017-Nov-26 at 03:57

            Hello I am studying dorng for parallel computing. I want to see the total execution time for each k time and store into dataframe. However when I see the results stored in the list timetable, elapsed time is negative value which makes no sense to me. What is wrong with my code?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Nov-26 at 03:57

            proc.time() is reset within clusters, so you are comparing how long your main R process has been running to how long your newly created clusters have been running, giving the negative values. It is better to use the Sys.time() function in this situation, which compares back to the central clock. So, to count time from starting the parallel process until each cluster finishes processing:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47492472

            QUESTION

            parallel lapply with random generation
            Asked 2017-Apr-09 at 21:23

            What is the best way to translate the following function to parallel processing?

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Apr-09 at 21:23

            The future_lapply() function of the future package (I'm the author) provides parallel RNGs using L'Ecuyer-CMRG RNG streams, which is also what parallel::mclapply() uses. It works the same across all OSes and regardless of parallel backend.

            The following works on all OSes, including Windows:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43311054

            QUESTION

            foreach with serial and parallel backend giving different results
            Asked 2017-Apr-06 at 09:40

            I have a strange case where using foreach with a serial and parallel backend gives different results the first time I call but then later on both results matches. I used RNG to make the results reproducible for the same seed

            Below is a sample function to explain the scenario :

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Apr-06 at 09:40

            The solution is to use the following expression:

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43250979

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install doRNG

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/renozao/doRNG.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone renozao/doRNG

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:renozao/doRNG.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link