eventcloud | Sample SaaS Event Management Application | Microservice library
kandi X-RAY | eventcloud Summary
kandi X-RAY | eventcloud Summary
Sample SaaS (Multi Tenant) Event Management Application
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of eventcloud
eventcloud Key Features
eventcloud Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on eventcloud
QUESTION
I was trying to test EventCloud Multi-tenant Saas (.Net Core + Angular SPA) locally but it throws this error found in debug log file
...ANSWER
Answered 2019-Jan-02 at 03:30I solved my problem from here .
Angular 6 looks for angular.json instead of angular-cli.json.
You need to update your @angular/cli.
I did update all the package with the following commands and updated all dependencies too. So as to remove all compatibility issues with other packages.
If you are starting your app or demo app, follow this procedure. Be extra careful if you are doing this for production app.
//to update your package.json
QUESTION
I am currently working on multitenant saas webapp using aspboilerplate and would like to implement the permission management but I got little bit of confusion.
Firstly, what's the difference between MultitenancySides.Host
and MultitenancySides.Tenant
which I have found here....
ANSWER
Answered 2018-Dec-29 at 11:10Firstly, what's the difference between
MultiTenancySides.Host
andMultitenancySides.Tenant
?
MultiTenancySides.Host
→ can only be assigned to Host users (user.TenantId == null
).
MultiTenancySides.Tenant
→ can only be assigned to Tenant users (user.TenantId != null
).
Secondly, how
[AbpAuthorize]
differs from[AbpAuthorize(PermissionNames.Pages_Tenants)]
?
[AbpAuthorize]
→ user is logged in.
[AbpAuthorize(PermissionNames.Pages_Tenants)]
→ user is logged in and has that permission.
QUESTION
in this tutorial about the EventCloud example app: https://aspnetboilerplate.com/Pages/Documents/Articles/Developing-MultiTenant-SaaS-ASP.NET-CORE-Angular/index.html
the text states: the creation of a new entity must be done using the static method "Create" in the "Event" class (not using "new Entity(....)")
1) so my first question is: which design pattern is this? Factory? Builder? other?
...ANSWER
Answered 2018-Jun-08 at 22:06Here are my answers:
1-) Event is being created with a static factory method. There are 2 ways to create an entity in Domain Driven Design
.
- Creating with static factory methods: It's a convenient way of creating business entities. And this method is being used in EventCloud. The only downside of this method is it's static! If your entity is holding state it's not good for testability. But there are 3 advantages of this approach;
- They have names: for example
Event.CreatePublicEvent()
,Create.PrivateEvent()
- They can cache: You can cache them in a private static
HashSet
orDictionary
. - They can subtype.
- They have names: for example
Creating with a constructor: If you have only one constructor then creating an object through its public constructor is the most convenient approach in
Domain Driven Design
. As long as you make parameterless constructor protected or private. Besides, an entity should be responsible for its own data integrity and validity so you have to set all business related public properties as private setter and you should allow them to change through public methods.Further information, see https://www.yegor256.com/2017/11/14/static-factory-methods.html
2-) EventManager is a domain service that is used for business logic. And Event.Create()
is being used in the EventAppService
class. Click here to see where exactly is being executed. Even Event.Create()
method consists of a single line of code but it's open for extension.
I hope that will be useful ;)
Happy coding...
QUESTION
I don't know if this question duplicate. Please give me the link of it if this question is duplicated.
My question is how to call 2 stored procedures that consists of BEGIN TRANSACTION & COMMIT TRANSACTION
(Service Broker).
I have 2 stored procedures that use to do some action of Service Broker.
This is the stored procedure that contains BEGIN CONVERSATION
:
ANSWER
Answered 2017-Oct-19 at 07:59The issue has been solved.
The reason of this issue happened is because I use a framework that cause this situation happened. The framework is included a transaction at starting, so what I need to do is disable the transaction of the framework then the issue is solved.
The framework that I'm using is ASP.NET Zero
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install eventcloud
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page