CQRS | simple project to explain CQRS | Microservice library
kandi X-RAY | CQRS Summary
kandi X-RAY | CQRS Summary
There are many forms of CQRS implementation. The implementation of the BookARoom project follows this version:. from original source: The objective of this lab is to add the "cancel a reservation" feature.
Support
Quality
Security
License
Reuse
Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA
Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of CQRS
CQRS Key Features
CQRS Examples and Code Snippets
Community Discussions
Trending Discussions on CQRS
QUESTION
I'm practicing the CQRS pattern and I can't understand it. I need to execute a command to create an entity, which in turn has navigation properties .It turns out that when creating, I request data from the database by ObjectId. But it turns out I'm doing query in command.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-01 at 22:32when the concept of CQRS defines the segregation of commands for write operations and queries for reading operations, it doesn't mean that it must be so strict as you think.
There are reasons for that segregation of responsability. One of them for example is to escale write operations from read operations based on Business demands. Other, is to use different databases if you need.
You can find more information on this msdn documentation.
QUESTION
I was going through the article, https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs which says, "If separate read and write databases are used, they must be kept in sync". One obvious benefit I can understand from having separate read replicas is that they can be scaled horizontally. However, I have some doubts:
- It says, "Updating the database and publishing the event must occur in a single transaction". My understanding is that there is no guarantee that the updated data will be available immediately on the read-only nodes because it depends on when the event will be consumed by the read-only nodes. Did I get it correctly?
- Data must be first written to read-only nodes before it can be read i.e. write operations are also performed on the read-only nodes. Why are they called read-only nodes? Is it because the write operations are performed on these nodes not directly by the data producer application; but rather by some serverless function (e.g. AWS Lambda or Azure Function) that picks up the event from the topic (e.g. Kafka topic) to which the write-only node has sent the event?
- Is the data sharded across the read-only nodes or does every read-only node have the complete set of data?
ANSWER
Answered 2022-Apr-02 at 12:19All of these have "it depends"-like answers...
Yes, usually, although some implementations might choose to (try to) update read models transactionally with the update. With multiple nodes you're quickly forced to learn the CAP theorem, though, and so in many CQRS contexts, eventual consistency is just accepted as a feature, as the gains from tolerating it usually significantly outweigh the losses. I suspect the bit you quoted anyway refers to transactionally updating the write store with publishing the event. Even this can be difficult to achieve, and is one of the problems event sourcing seeks to solve.
Yes. It's trivially obvious - in this context - that data must be written before it can be read, but your apps as consumers of the data see them as read-only.
Both are valid outcomes. Usually this part is less an application concern and is more delegated to the capabilities of your chosen read-model infrastructure (Mongo, Cosmos, Dynamo, etc).
QUESTION
I am beginner for Java software language. I have been working on C# software language.
I would like to ask a question. I have been working on a project that is about a small core banking solution. I wonder if I can use MyBatis,IBatis with CQRS Pattern and Domain Driven Design instead of using org.springframework.data.repository or not. Is using mybatis a good fit for the CQRS pattern?
I have been researching an example project on the Internet, but I could not find it. I wonder if there is an example for me or not.
Do you have any ideas?
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Mar-19 at 00:22DDD and CQRS don't care about the framework you are using for db persistence.
In the sense that for DDD (the nearest part to the db persistence) has its way, commonly through the repository pattern, to abstract away the persistence.
So, theoretically you could just create your interfaces for the repositories and implement them using whatever thing you want.
What is important to DDD is that your implementation for the persistence respect the guarantees needed for the repositories (like storing an aggregate is an atomic operation), but if you can meet them, any implementation will make your domain work as expected.
About being a good fit, it depends on the benifits your situation can gain from using one or the other, spring data + hibernate are very easy to setup and use, and they also have a lot of automatism already implemented, with IBatis maybe you can write custom queries more performant, as most of the things in computer science, it depends.
QUESTION
I have a microservice in Quarkus which implementing CQRS/Event sourcing using AxonIq Framework. I Already made it using Spring boot and everythings it's ok. I would like to migrate it in Quarkus but I have error during maven compilation probably because the Ioc. When CDI try to create the service I think he can inject Axon CommandGateway and QueryGateway.
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-22 at 08:06I had the same issue, one of the reasons can be that your bean is brought by a dependency and to fix it you need to add an empty beans.xml in main/resources/META-INF in this dependency in order for Quarkus to discover the beans as indicated by the documentation
Relevant extract:
The bean archive is synthesized from:
the application classes,
dependencies that contain a beans.xml descriptor (content is ignored),
dependencies that contain a Jandex index - META-INF/jandex.idx,
dependencies referenced by quarkus.index-dependency in application.properties,
and Quarkus integration code.
QUESTION
I'm using Axon for implementation of CQRS/Event sourcing in my Vert.X microservice. In the bootstrap of my Verticle I have a createInfra methid for creation of my Axon context. When I try to get a ressource from ny projection I have no result and the request executed without end. When I check the QueryGateway, in the SimpleGatewayBus I have no subscription.
If someone can help me for fix my Axon configuration ? And I have a trouble with MongoDB Eventstore configuration.
Verticle
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-18 at 08:06I see 2 problems in the configuration:
You just "build" the configuration, but don't start it. After
buildConfiguration()
, make sure to call 'start()' on the returned Configuration instance. Alternatively, directly callstart()
on the Configurer. It returns a started configuration instance.That should resolve the registrations not coming through. But it will probably trigger an exception related to the next issue....
Your MongoTokenStore configuration is incomplete. The TokenStore needs at least a serializer and a
MongoTemplate
instance. The latter tells the Axon which collections you want to certain types of information in. In your case, only theTrackingTokenCollection
would be relant.
QUESTION
I have a CQRS/Eventsourcing architecture with 3 microservices. I implemented 2 microservices with vert.x 4 and I implemented CQRS/Eventsourcing without framework to improve my knowledge of this type of architecture. For the third microservice I would like to use AxonIq Framework but I have a problem with Aggregate annotation because it's not avalaible with vert.x but only with Spring. I implemented a Spring microservice using Axon and everything work fine but I would like to know if someone can help me for use vert.x with AxonIq ? If anyone know a workaround for this problem ?
Thank
...ANSWER
Answered 2022-Feb-15 at 11:05Axon Farmework provide something called Configuration API
. You can have a look at the Configuration class but for making use of it, you need a Configurer, which will provide you all means of configuring your components!
On the ref-guide, you also have several examples of how to do the configuration using the API or Srring Boot. Example for Commands can be found here.
To help a bit more, I can also share a small project I made using Dropwizard and Axon Framework, meaning no Spring was used and all the Configuration was done through the API. You can find it here https://github.com/lfgcampos/axon-playground/tree/master/chat-getting-started-dropwizard
QUESTION
Helllo I already use this pattern of Mediator CQRS with Pipeline Behavior for a while, but just now i'm facing a issue where the generic implementation of TResponse and TRequest are not enough. So i'm trying to understand if having two separate pipelines for two very specific request is a bad practice or a bad ideia.
So the main idea is, having a PipelineBehavior to do a specific logic for the requestOne, and another PipelineBehavior to do another logic that doesn't apply to request one.
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-10 at 17:08I don't think its a bad idea at all, you can create an interface for mark all the requests you want to implement the PipelineX, and other for PipelineY.
Ex:
You have the RequestOne and RequestTwo classes that need to go through PipelineX, so you create and interface like IPipelineOne and mark the classes with it, then use reflection to process inside the pripeline middleware. The PipelineY will still run through these two classes and the rest of the program as well with no problems
QUESTION
When implementing a domain with CQRS, domain-driven design and event sourcing, is it worth the effort creating a command, an event, an aggregate and a command handler for commands with little to no domain logic e.g. if I have a requirement to say, create a group, where perhaps the only requirement is to ensure the group name is not empty, is there a need to have a Group aggregate, a CreateGroup command, a GroupCreated event and a CreateGroupCommandHandler in this case?
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-24 at 02:07Even when the domain is light on logic, so to speak, the value that comes with modelling aggregates (in-memory persistence, constraints management etc.) and events (intent modelling, business transaction log + audit log, integration etc.) still apply. Additionally, the reasons for modelling command messages separate from event messages still apply (it's about the intent of the message and they can evolve independently). More-so, a domain light on logic, so to speak might not always remain so.
I think it might be possible, however to not have an explicit class representing the command handler. The command to aggregate mapping could be done in some other way.
However, for cases where the domain does not manage the constraints e.g. in the case where the events really are implicitly-external e.g. if the groups are managed elsewhere and simply need to be replicated to our domain, it should suffice to have only an event.
QUESTION
I'm building a .NET 5 REST API based on CQRS/MediatR and I noticed a linear memory increase when stress testing my application. I did some profiling and saw a large number of object instances from the namespace System.Linq.Expression
was taking up all the space. All these instances are related to the MapperConfiguration
of AM.
I use AutoMapper to map my entities to the DTOs, to do so I mainly use the following ProjectTo
extension method :
ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-20 at 20:00QUESTION
Lets say I am creating a bidding website that is Event Sourced and uses CQRS.
Here are our two basic Entities:
...ANSWER
Answered 2021-Dec-19 at 01:15Should State Changes generated at the read side create more events?
"State changes generated at the read side" is a very... odd... spelling to use in the CQRS pattern.
In the usual arrangement, information from "the outside" is delivered to the write model, and that's where we perform our computation to decide what the new "authoritative" state of the entity is.
The read model is a non-authoritative copy of state; accurate as of some point in the past, but not necessary up to date. Think "cache".
State changes generated by the cache is weird, because the cache is reflection of the write model.
Now, what will sometimes happen, is that we have two models, and the second model will be interested in changes that happen to the first model.
In that case, we use some form of plumbing to connect the outputs of one model to the inputs of the other.
So we have Alice doing her work, and one of the reports (read model) produced by Alice's work becomes one of Bob's inputs as he does his work.
Now, you might -- as a matter of optimization -- broadcast "events" when the caches update, so that subscribers can know that there is information available for processing. But you probably shouldn't be framing these as "state changes" in the sense of being changes to the entities in your domain model. Those changes have already happened, under the governance of the write model.
Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network
Vulnerabilities
No vulnerabilities reported
Install CQRS
Support
Reuse Trending Solutions
Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items
Find more librariesStay Updated
Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps
Share this Page