DDD-CQRS-ES-Example | Domain Driven Design , CQRS , & Event Sourcing Example | Microservice library

 by   dcomartin JavaScript Version: Current License: No License

kandi X-RAY | DDD-CQRS-ES-Example Summary

kandi X-RAY | DDD-CQRS-ES-Example Summary

DDD-CQRS-ES-Example is a JavaScript library typically used in Architecture, Microservice applications. DDD-CQRS-ES-Example has no bugs, it has no vulnerabilities and it has low support. You can download it from GitHub.

CQRS & DDD Example with GetEventStore, CommonDomain, NServiceBus, Entity Framework.
Support
    Quality
      Security
        License
          Reuse

            kandi-support Support

              DDD-CQRS-ES-Example has a low active ecosystem.
              It has 105 star(s) with 33 fork(s). There are 16 watchers for this library.
              OutlinedDot
              It had no major release in the last 6 months.
              DDD-CQRS-ES-Example has no issues reported. There are no pull requests.
              It has a neutral sentiment in the developer community.
              The latest version of DDD-CQRS-ES-Example is current.

            kandi-Quality Quality

              DDD-CQRS-ES-Example has 0 bugs and 0 code smells.

            kandi-Security Security

              DDD-CQRS-ES-Example has no vulnerabilities reported, and its dependent libraries have no vulnerabilities reported.
              DDD-CQRS-ES-Example code analysis shows 0 unresolved vulnerabilities.
              There are 0 security hotspots that need review.

            kandi-License License

              DDD-CQRS-ES-Example does not have a standard license declared.
              Check the repository for any license declaration and review the terms closely.
              OutlinedDot
              Without a license, all rights are reserved, and you cannot use the library in your applications.

            kandi-Reuse Reuse

              DDD-CQRS-ES-Example releases are not available. You will need to build from source code and install.
              It has 687161 lines of code, 0 functions and 373 files.
              It has low code complexity. Code complexity directly impacts maintainability of the code.

            Top functions reviewed by kandi - BETA

            kandi's functional review helps you automatically verify the functionalities of the libraries and avoid rework.
            Currently covering the most popular Java, JavaScript and Python libraries. See a Sample of DDD-CQRS-ES-Example
            Get all kandi verified functions for this library.

            DDD-CQRS-ES-Example Key Features

            No Key Features are available at this moment for DDD-CQRS-ES-Example.

            DDD-CQRS-ES-Example Examples and Code Snippets

            No Code Snippets are available at this moment for DDD-CQRS-ES-Example.

            Community Discussions

            QUESTION

            How to handle business rules in DDD + CQRS + Event Sourcing approach?
            Asked 2017-Jun-08 at 15:51

            I'm trying to figure out how to deal with complex domain model using CQRS/ES approach. Let's imagine we have e.g. Order domain entity, which handles both state and behavior of order. It has a Status property with transition rules for switching between statuses (implementing State pattern or any other kind of state machine). According to DDD principles, this logic should be implemented in Order class (representing the Order model) itself, having methods like approve(), cancel(), ship(), etc.

            Looking at different public examples of this kind architecture, it turns out that domain entity and aggregate root is the same, and it handles both the state and behavior and even its own projection from events. Isn't it a violation of SRP?

            But my question is more concrete: if I want to process new command (and apply new event), should I reconstitute entity from event stream (i.e. from write model and write db) and call its behavioral methods (which applies events to state) to handle business rules? Or just handle commands and events themselves, without having any write-model entity?

            Pseudocode to illustrate:

            ...

            ANSWER

            Answered 2017-Jun-07 at 11:28
            TL;DR

            But my question is more concrete: if I want to process new command (and apply new event), should I reconstitute entity from event stream (i.e. from write model and write db) and call its behavioral methods (which applies events to state) to handle business rules?

            Yes.

            Or just handle commands and events themselves, without having any write-model entity?

            No.

            Once more, with feeling

            The command handler lives in the application component; the business model lives in the domain component.

            The motivation for keeping these components separated: making model replacement cost effective. What the domain experts care about, where the business gets its win, is the domain model. We don't expect to write the business model once and get it correct for all of time -- much more likely that we will learn more about how we want the model to work, and therefore be delivering improvements to the model on a regular basis. Therefore, its important that there not be a lot of drag to replace one version of the model with another -- we want the replacement to be easy; we want the amount of work required to make the change to be reflected in the business value we get.

            So we want the good stuff separated from "the plumbing".

            Keeping all of the business logic in the domain component gives you two easy wins; first, you don't ever have to guess about where the business logic lives -- whether the specifics of the use case are easy or hard, the business logic is going to be in the Order, not anywhere else. Second, because the business logic is not in the command handler, you don't have to worry about creating a bunch of test doubles to satisfy those dependency requirements -- you can test against the domain model directly.

            So, we use handlers to reconstitute entities and calling their business logic methods, NOT to handling business logic itself?

            Almost -- we use repositories to reconstitute entities and aggregates to handle the business logic. The role of the command handler is orchestration; it's the glue between the data model and the domain model.

            Source https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44400402

            Community Discussions, Code Snippets contain sources that include Stack Exchange Network

            Vulnerabilities

            No vulnerabilities reported

            Install DDD-CQRS-ES-Example

            You can download it from GitHub.

            Support

            For any new features, suggestions and bugs create an issue on GitHub. If you have any questions check and ask questions on community page Stack Overflow .
            Find more information at:

            Find, review, and download reusable Libraries, Code Snippets, Cloud APIs from over 650 million Knowledge Items

            Find more libraries
            CLONE
          • HTTPS

            https://github.com/dcomartin/DDD-CQRS-ES-Example.git

          • CLI

            gh repo clone dcomartin/DDD-CQRS-ES-Example

          • sshUrl

            git@github.com:dcomartin/DDD-CQRS-ES-Example.git

          • Stay Updated

            Subscribe to our newsletter for trending solutions and developer bootcamps

            Agree to Sign up and Terms & Conditions

            Share this Page

            share link